[news.eclipse.tools.buckminster] Re: Best way to include launchers in an

["Tas Frangoullides" <tfrangoullides@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Thomas,

OK. I've opened an umbrella bug and specified the dependencies I know about. 
I've left the severity as Normal; For me it's a major problem for migrating 
builds because I can't get a buckminster build to work without changing the 
source and affecting the output of existing builds... but I don't know how 
important this is for others.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=286501

I also looked further into the problems I have with product configurations 
that don't specify any start levels for plug-ins. It turns out PDE Build 
does some defaulting. This isn't too big an issue because product 
configurations in existing PDE builds can be modified to equivalent settings 
without affecting the output but I've opened a bug for completeness.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=286498

Many Thanks,
Tas


"Thomas Hallgren" <thomas@xxxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:h5v2um$fn0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi Tas,
>
> On 08/12/2009 07:04 PM, Tas Frangoullides wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > > Can you please file a bugzilla for this? The equinox executable
> > > feature is not intended for runtimes. It's to be considered a pure
> > > build-time feature and the inclusion of it should be necessary.
> >
> > I assume you mean shoudln't?
> Doh, yes of course.
>
> > I have filed a bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=286413
> Thanks.
>
> > Do you already have a bug for ensuring that given the same source
> > buckminster and PDE Build produce comparable results? I can't find one.
> > Should I open one?
> Sure, why not. Add an umbrella bugzilla for everything related to the diff 
> and then add 286413 as a "Depends on" to that bug since that's one of the 
> things that needs to be addressed.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren