[news.eclipse.tools.buckminster] Re: Buckminster updating / change-list

[Johannes Utzig <mail@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Peter,

it's actually the opposite of intruding.
I started with the Hudson plugin because I needed a good buckminster 
integration for Hudson to have some convincing arguments why we should 
utilize Buckminster instead of the existing ant script hell. The more 
help there is, the better will the integration be at the end, so your 
help is very much appreciated.

I'd say the user base of the buckminster hudson plugin is rather tiny 
right now, so I'm always happy to hear feedback from other users what's 
currently hurting them and what features they are missing.
So please let me know about what else you'd need to satisfy your 
company's needs.
btw: I asked Kohsuke about a buckminster component in the Hudson Issue 
Tracker so I don't keep abusing the buckminster newsgroup (Sorry for 
that, Thomas :) )
Should be in place soon I hope:
https://hudson.dev.java.net/issues/



Best regards,
Johannes

Peter M. Murray schrieb:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> I've read your past posts on this topic and hope I'm not intruding by 
> sticking my oar in. 
> We're eager to get this integration going as we've got the hood up on 
> our build/ci system currently and I'd like to go straight to Buckminster 
> if we can get this all ironed out.
>
> -pete