[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Newsgroup Home]
[news.eclipse.technology.ohf] Re: ATNA with rfc3195 
Hi Mauro,

Thanks for the nice props :) OHF is licensed under the Eclipse Public License v1 (http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html). The EPL is largely an unrestricted license...you can take the code and use/modify it at will without fee or without having to contribute changes back.

As for your question about auditing, I think the best way to answer this is that the OHF ATNA components, in line with the requirements of ITI-20, work "as expected by IHE". In essence, what OHF provides as-is is sufficient to pass the ATNA tests in the way that IHE expects at Connectathon.

There will be two OHF representatives at EU Connectathon in Berlin supporting a couple other vendors of OHF and we would be happy to work with you as well. One thing we do on-site at Connectathon is create a vendor-driven community between OHF users, which can be a great resource to you as well as the others using OHF. This community helps consolidate infrastructure configurations and help produce fixes/workarounds for any potential problems that may arise. If you have any questions, I invite you to email me directly.

-Matt
mattadav@xxxxxxxxxx


Mauro Mugnaini wrote: 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,
First of all, allow me to congratulate you on the great job you're doing with
the OHF. I'm not sure if this newsgroup is the right place to send questions
but I hope it is :-).

I'm taking a look at your artifacts in order to evaluate an experimental use
for our participation in the upcoming Europe Contect-a-thon in Berlin. I
didn't find any legal information about use of OHF on the site and I take the
opportunity of this email to ask you for some information in this sense.

BTW my question is about the ATNA, as the subject foresee! :-)
If I'm not wrong OHF audit implementation provides only BSD Syslog support.
It is possible to use classes in order to send audits to an Audit Record
Repository using the rfc3195, mandatory in the ITI-20 transaction? In your
opinion is possible for me to add these functionalities without any extra
effort of the change of the underling protocol to TCP and messaging
conformance to the RFC? (I only suppose, I haven't read the protocol
differences yet, I don't know if there are any).

Thank you in advantage, best regards.

- --
Have a nice day, bye...

   Mauro Mugnaini.

- --------------------------------
- --- PGP public key available ---
- --------------------------------
Dott. Mauro Mugnaini

Synapsis S.r.l.
     in Computer Science

P.zza Dante, 19/20
57121 Livorno
tel: 0586 426790
fax: 0586 443954
www.websynapsis.com

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE   [Italian Dec. Lgs 196 of 30/06/2003]        |
| This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons |
| above and may contain confidential information.                      |
| If you are not the addressee or an authorized recipient of this      |
| message, be informed that any use of the content hereof is           |
| prohibited.                                                          |
| Please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message.   |
| Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to:     |
| postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                           |
|                                           Thank you.                 |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGAmnuJEDP0OsyHqgRAkr4AJ93CbMhjvD+PF9cG3t2vmZpBcNX6ACgm1sb
dnTHk7QdvXl5Ure/5hsDevg=
=KhxX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----