[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
] [
Newsgroup Home
]
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
From
:
josh.davis@xxxxxxxxxx
(Josh Davis)
Date
: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups
:
eclipse.rt.eclipselink
Organization
: Eclipse
User-agent
: NewsPortal/0.36 (http://florian-amrhein.de/newsportal)
I was able to replace the eclipselink.jar without incidence, but I still see the same behavior. I'll post a bug.
Follow-Ups
:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
From:
Christoph John
References
:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
From:
Josh Davis
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
From:
James
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
From:
Josh Davis
Prev by Date:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: merge does not copy basic mappings
Next by Date:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Having clause - more unexpected pickiness
Previous by thread:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
Next by thread:
[news.eclipse.rt.eclipselink] Re: Is JPA QL supposed to be this picky?
Index(es):
Date
Thread