[news.eclipse.modeling.mdt.uml2] Re: UML middleweight extension:making u

["James Bruck" <jbruck@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Deepak,

Can you explain a bit further what you mean by "if I run my extended model, 
I see unessecary elements...".
Do you mean that in an editor, if you try to change the type of an element, 
for example, that you will have the option of choosing uml::Class etc.
If that is the case, you can try to customize the ItemProviders for your 
custom solution.

- James.


"Deepak" <dee_n@xxxxxx> wrote in message 
news:gh13ig$qkj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
> I am modeling an UML-specific DSL using the middleweight concept.
>
> Mainly, I want to create a specific version of the Activity diagram ( with 
> OCL, less variety of elements...).
>
> If I run my extended UML-Metamodel, I will also see unnessecary/unrelated 
> elements like Statemachine, Class and so on.
>
> Is it possible to narrow down the selectable elements to those which are 
> based on the extended UML-Metamodel ?
>
>
> With regards,
>
> Deepak
>
>
>
>
>
>