[news.eclipse.modeling.gmf] Re: GMF mapping Audit Rules

[aachila@xxxxxxxxxxx (Achilleas )]

Hi Christian,

You are always a step ahead with your answers:))..Since I tried your 
second suggestion and my next question was going to be: "Why the problem 
marker does not display the message assigned in the corresponding Audit 
Rule?" I rather gives a custom message that denotes the problem.

Your clarifications are very helpful and give me an insight when I should 
use each constraint to fit my needs.

I have another question for you though:), if you please could provide me 
with an answer!

Lets assume that I have two metamodels that are defined as follows:

Metamodel 1:
 Root1(aggregates classes1)
    Class1(includes value1)
       Value1

Metamodel 2:
 Root2(aggregates classes2)
    Class2(includes value2)
       Value2

Is it possible to load into the gmfmap model of Metamodel 1 the resource 
(i.e. ecore,gmfmap) that points to Metamodel 2 so that I can check if 
there two instances with equal values (value1,value2)???--- in this case I 
require them to be equal!

Can it be done in a single audit rule similar to the one below (that you 
originally provided)?

  context Class1
  inv:
    Class2.allInstances()->forAll(c2 | self.value1 <> c2.value2)

Thanks,

Achilleas