[news.eclipse.gef3d] [OT] Re: Progress on update site?

[Miles Parker <milesparker@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chris,

When did you last use this? I tried CBI early this year along with a 
bunch of other stuff but the only thing that I was able to get working 
in the end was the PDE Automated Build Process. It wasn't so bad 
really, especially after the week or two I spent banging my head 
against the wall on other alternatives.

So.. as I'm in a cruch to get my own udpate site up, can I ask.. if it 
were you, and you had a very large set of projects with new namespaces, 
organization, etc.., would you try to get your existing releng 
converted, or would you just go with CBI. IOTW, is it really as easy as 
that doc makes it sound? ;)

thanks,

Miles


On 2009-08-11 17:34:12 -0700, Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

> Miles Parker wrote:
> > OK guys, I don't feel bad asking this as I'm going through the pain 
> > myself right now. Do you expect to have an update site available 
> > sometime in the near future? I can't include my 3D component until the 
> > GEF3D component is available through an update site. Unless.. hmm, I 
> > suppose I could just make the plugins available at my update site for 
> > now..?
>
> I'd probably get the GEF3D team to take advantage of Athena CBI for 
> their build...
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Common_Build_Infrastructure/Getting_Started/Build_In_Eclipse
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Common_Build_Infrastructure/Getting_Started/Build_In_Hudson

They 
> can take advantage of the common build infrastructure at Eclipse.org to 
> build and publish GEF3D. It just takes a bit of time to setup.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Aniszczyk | EclipseSource Austin | +1 860 839 2465
> http://twitter.com/eclipsesource | http://twitter.com/caniszczyk