Re: [Wtp-wst-dev] Bugs, ChangeRequests and Enhancements

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ursula,

May I ask why you are not using WSDL?
WSDL is very extensible. Have you considered defining a WSDL extension?
You could then use the WSDL editor and validator. Lawrence can explain
their extensibility.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

"Sannemann, Z 1903, BN" <U.Sannemann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-wst-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/22/2006 05:22 AM

Please respond to
"Web Standard Tools developer discussions." <wtp-wst-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	<wtp-wst-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"Shakirin, A., Z 1903, Fa. IC Consult, Bonn" <Andrei.Shakirin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	[Wtp-wst-dev] Bugs, ChangeRequests and Enhancements

I'm not sure I hit the right contact: we want to use
the WTP and Web
Standards Tools for creating our own WSDL-like service descriptions and
add new xml editors where necessary. We want to use the tools as they
are but need the extension points to regard our specific restrictions,
extensions and validations. We now get stuck on a bug that is already
known and we would like to provide the fix for testing and integration
into the next version. We also like to make suggestions for new
extension points. 
Can you tell me the correct process for these contributions?
Thanks in advance,

--
Ursula Sannemann
Deutsche Post AG
SOPSOLUTIONS(r)
D - 53250 Bonn
fon:        +49(0)228 182 19111 
fax:        +49(0)228 182 19099

_______________________________________________
wtp-wst-dev mailing list
wtp-wst-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-wst-dev