Can we try June 16-19 in Paris/Grenoble?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Naci Dai [mailto:naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: jeudi 13 mai 2004 14:36
> To: Dominique DE VITO
> Cc: Christophe Ney
> Subject: Re: Eclipse WTP kick-off meeting dates/organization
>
>
> I am already booked for the two weeks for June 21-July5th
>
> At 12:56 PM 5/13/2004, Dominique DE VITO wrote:
> >Hi Naci,
> >
> >At first sight, JavaOne dates are not the good ones.
> >One reason being that subproject leaders are not available or do
> not prefer
> >these dates!
> >June 14-17 is slightly inadequate due to Eclipse conf in Germany.
> >
> >What do you feel about June 17-22 in Grenoble/France (hosted by
INRIA) ?
> >Starting June 17, Thursday (starting PM) to June, 22, Tuesday
> (finishing AM),
> >So WE included.
> >We plan to work Saturday morning, the rest of the WE will be
> informal (maybe
> >some event in Alpes mountains).
> >
> >Dominique
> >
> >
> >
> >Naci Dai wrote :
> >
> > > Hi Dominique,
> > >
> > > I prefer the June 14-17 to JavaONE
> > >
> > > At 08:45 PM 5/12/2004, Dominique DE VITO wrote:
> > > >Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > >It's time for discussing about the code camp, even if
discussions are
> > > >subject to board approval!
> > > >
> > > >We need to run the kick-off meeting in June: Summer is a
> dead zone for
> > > >meetings and it would be harder in September/October.
> > > >
> > > >One possibility for dates is: June, 14-17.
> > > >
> > > >According Erich Gamma, we won't have the participation of the
Eclipse
> > > >platform guys (Eclipse 3.0 priority). But the kick-off meeting is
> > > >especially to establish the groundwork for the project. As I
see the
> > > >organization, the idea behind is to have a second meeting in
> > > >September/October with Eclipse platform team for a better
> integration of
> > > >Eclipse projects (of course, if some (?) Eclipse platform
> team members may
> > > >be available for June, they will be welcome, but we can't rely
on!)
> > > >
> > > >There is a second possibility.
> > > >
> > > >A Erich Gamma's idea is to have a kick-off meeting in parallel
with
> > > >JavaOne.
> > > >
> > > >So, what do you think about the different idea ?
> > > >
> > > >The other point is the meeting organization (+/- impacting
> the dates).
> > > >
> > > >Arthur Ryman has proposed the following agenda:
> > > >- 2 days for reviews of the contributions,
> > > >- 1 day for planning discussions (plan the initial code base
> and adopt one
> > > >or another component, or merge),
> > > >- 1 day for wrap up and consensus.
> > > >
> > > >To quote (again) Arthur: "We could shorten it more if we run
the code
> > > >reviews in parallel sessions" and "We should leave the
> meeting with a plan
> > > >for Milestone 0, and a roadmap for development".
> > > >
> > > >Thanks for your feed-back/opinion.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Dominique De Vito
> > > >Thales+ObjectWeb
> > > >// dominique.devito@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Naci Dai,
> > > Managing Director
> > >
> > > eteration a.s.
> > > Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
> > > Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
> > > +90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
> > > +90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
> > > +90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)
> > > http://www.eteration.com
> > > mailto:nacidai@xxxxxxx
> > > mailto:naci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Naci Dai,
> Managing Director
>
> eteration a.s.
> Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
> Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
> +90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
> +90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
> +90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)
> http://www.eteration.com
> mailto:nacidai@xxxxxxx
> mailto:naci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
