Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-pmc] FW: [wtp-dev] RDB Requests PMC Approval For WTP 1.5.5 Defects

Ok. I am fine with treating RDB as an exception. We do need to make sure that there are no API changes, breakages.

 


From: David M Williams [mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 6:49 PM
To: raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx; WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Subject: Re: [wtp-pmc] FW: [wtp-dev] RDB Requests PMC Approval For WTP 1.5.5 Defects

 


RDB is an exception. Since this is their _only_ avenue to "ship code" -- and their last opportunity at that.  Their intent is, I think, is defensible and worth while for an "end of life" component. Not all adopters can migrate to DTP yet, and some of these enhancements are to maintain parity with or for DTP, so once those adopters do migrate, it will still be equivalent (that is, there is no split-stream-like departure from the strategic direction of DTP).  Plus, it's relatively safe, since the RDB code is highly independent of the rest of WTP.

As I explained in one of our phone meetings, myself and the RDB team discussed the possibility of doing this work as "private patches" to RDB, but I encouraged them to do this work "in the open", as the best approach most likely to not surprise or interfere with any other adopters.

Of course, that's also why we have PMC review ... feel free to voice other opinions.

Or, if you were simply asking if others would be proposing feature enhancements to 1.5.5, the answer is no (at least, none that I know of!).
If they do, I know my criteria for acceptance will be much much higher than for this RDB work!

Thanks,





"raghunathan srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/23/2007 09:17 PM

Please respond to
"raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx"        <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"WTP PMC communications \(including coordination, announcements,        and Group discussions\)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and        Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc

 

Subject

[wtp-pmc] FW: [wtp-dev] RDB Requests PMC Approval For WTP 1.5.5        Defects

 

 

 




Hi,
 
I reviewed  1880243 and 188761. The ‘patch’  has extensive code changes and looks more like a feature enhancement. Is RDB an exception or do we plan to include such enhancements in a maintenance release?
-Raghu
 

 



From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lawrence E Dunnell
Sent:
Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:21 PM
To:
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[wtp-dev] RDB Requests PMC Approval For WTP 1.5.5 Defects

 

180243 enhancements proposed for Access Control package of SQLModel & code regen using EMF2.2.1

188716 Extensibility for associating a State with any Object of the DB Explorer

188734 Animation/UI Job for Node Expansion/Catalog loading in the Database Explorer

188758 Add a Diagram Group to the Database Explorer Context Menu stack

188761 Database Explorer Connection Management Enhancements


Larry Dunnell
RAD Data Tools, DB2 Tooling,  Eclipse WTP Project and Eclipse DTP Project
IBM DB2 Information Management Software
_______________________________________________
wtp-pmc mailing list
wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-pmc


Back to the top