[wtp-pmc] Fw: AW: wtp 1.5 plan document

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I updated the Milestone plan [1] and
the Wiki [2] to agree with the Callisto plan [3]. This completes my action
item [4].

Pls let me know if there are any other
places where we have WTP 1.5 plan dates that need to be updated.

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/plans/1.5/reports/report-milestone-overview.html
[2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Web_Tools_Requirements_1.5

[3]  http://www.eclipse.org/projects/callisto.php

[4] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=124568

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
----- Forwarded by Arthur
Ryman/Toronto/IBM on 02/07/2006 09:49 PM -----

Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM

01/30/2006 11:14 PM

To	"Krause, Jochen" <jkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"David M Williams" <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Raghu Srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Subject	Re: AW: wtp 1.5 plan documentLink

Jochen,

Will do. I running behind on email so
give me a day or two.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx

"Krause, Jochen" <jkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

01/27/2006 05:39 AM

To	Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc	"Raghu Srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>, "David M Williams" <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	AW: wtp 1.5 plan document

Arthur,
 
Could you please alter the document
that I had taken the info from (regarding the M6 release date).
 
http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/plans/1.5/reports/report-milestone-overview.html
 
Thanks,
 
Jochen

---

Von: David M Williams [mailto:david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 06:17
An: Tim Wagner
Cc: Krause, Jochen; Raghu Srinivasan; Arthur
Betreff: RE: wtp 1.5 plan document


I believe our "M6" date at 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Web_Tools_Requirements_1.5
is simply wrong. 

At http://www.eclipse.org/projects/callisto.php 
there is an "RC0" listed for the last "staggered" checkpoint,
RC0 (1-Apr .. 14-Apr)

• 1-Apr - Platform
• 7-Apr - CDT, DTP, EMF, GEF, VE
• 14-Apr - BIRT, GMF, TPTP, WTP

So ... I'd recommend we plan our "M6" for April 14th. (we could
call it RC0, or RC1, but .. bugzilla is set up for "M6"). 

Then, after that ... nothing but RC's (Release candidates) in-line (non-staggered)
with Callisto. 
and the that final date be labeled as "release", not "milestone".

I've made changes to the wike document corresponding to this note ... feel
free to correct! 

David

"Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>

01/26/2006 05:09 PM

To	"Raghu Srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"Krause, Jochen" <jkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Arthur" <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>, David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Subject	RE: wtp 1.5 plan document

Good question - we should be in full code freeze in June, so what about
RC3 as the beginning of cooldown and RC4 as planned code freeze; that
leaves us a week of grace if we slip.

-----Original Message-----
From: Raghu Srinivasan [mailto:raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:37 PM
To: Tim Wagner
Cc: Krause, Jochen; Arthur; David M Williams
Subject: Re: wtp 1.5 plan document

Can we add one additional milestone between M5(March 3rd) and M6(June 
28th ) that will indicate the start of the ramp-down phase for WTP? This

will be helpful for planning purpose.

The Calisto RC dates are:

RC1 (14-Apr)
Starting with RC1, each project will apply its own ramp-down rules.
RC2 (28-Apr)
RC3 (12-May)
RC4 (26-May)
RC5 (16-Jun)
RC6 (28-Jun)

-Raghu

Tim Wagner wrote:
>
> I made a few minor changes (explanation of relationship to Callisto
> and release numbering clarification for the "incubation"
areas of JSF 
> and EJB3).
>
> Two additional things to check:
>
>     * Based on Marshall's response, I believe we should
pull JSR 88,
>       unless Gorkem or someone else is prepared to
spend time on it
>     * The Web Services area states an aggressive goal in
adopting a
>       number of spec revs; is Chris' team behind that
statement of
>       work, or should we list one or more of these
as optional/help
>       wanted items? (I think they're great goals, I
just don't want to
>       overstate our intentions to the community at
large.)
>
> Thanks for tackling this!
>
> -t
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Krause, Jochen [mailto:jkrause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:41 PM
> *To:* Tim Wagner; Arthur; David M Williams; 
> raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* wtp 1.5 plan document
>
> Hi,
>
> The document has been revised, please have a look:
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Web_Tools_Requirements_1.5
>
> Meeting notes (shall we move them to the web page, where?):
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/2006-01-23
>
> --jochen
>