Hi David,
Yes, please.
-Raghu
From:
wtp-jsf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-jsf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006
4:20 PM
To: Java Server Faces Tools
developer discussion
Subject: [wtp-jsf-dev] Would JSF
committers like "top level" modules in CVS?
In WTP, we added module definitions to our
CVSROOT/modules file, so that from the CVS Repository Explorer, all modules
appear at the "top level" of the tree.
Would
JSF like to do the same?
I'd
recommend it, as some users like scanning a long list alphabetically, instead
of a hierarchy. Plus, some Eclipse functions work better with modules defined
this
way (such as correctly finding branches, when using the "Refresh
Branches" action).
If
so, I can send a note to webmaster to have them added. You can see from current
file, they content is a subset of what's in the map files.
So
... your map files are "up to date", right?
This
came up recently in the JPA (sub)project so, thought I'd make the same offer to
you all in JSF.
BTW,
I'd recommend any ant scripts, etc., still use the 'long form" of the
name, not the shorter module name, just to
be
explicit.
Thanks,
