Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-dev] Fix regression in 3.5.2

Victor,

We are in PMC +1 mode during this phase of WTP 3.5.2 development.  You need to follow the process for PMC review of a defect.  (But don't forget that the process starts with Project Leader review of the defect.)  This early in the shutdown process for WTP 3.5.2, you should be able to get approval and get this fix in.  (Especially since it is in 3.6 and has been tested there for a bit.)  The full process is at https://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_PMC_Defect_Review

FWIW,

- Carl Anderson
WTP programmer

Inactive hide details for Victor Rubezhny ---01/26/2014 04:13:29 PM---Chris, This is a one-line-fix that need to be backported Victor Rubezhny ---01/26/2014 04:13:29 PM---Chris, This is a one-line-fix that need to be backported from master to


    From:

Victor Rubezhny <vrubezhny@xxxxxxxxxx>

    To:

wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

    Date:

01/26/2014 04:13 PM

    Subject:

Re: [wtp-dev] Fix regression in 3.5.2

    Sent by:

wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Chris,

This is a one-line-fix that need to be backported from master to R3_5_maintenance branch.

The issue is the regression made by fixing bug [384319] (CPU utilization to 100% when this is appended to new object definition) in commit ec87a3b8e0a51fc2baec20756c00429d9e68a587
This regression was found (see [419871] - DefaultInferenceProvider is always enabled) and fixed in master in commit 802e0ab714f7e3f9bf852ce72689628b218e9e62
The fix was provided and tested by Jason Peterson <jasonpet@xxxxxxxxxx>  2013-07-15 23:11:57.

Do we need to open that WTP PMC Defect Review Process in order to port the fix back into R3_5_maintenance branch?

Thanks in advance,
Victor



On 01/26/2014 08:55 PM, Dawid Pakuła wrote: _______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


GIF image

GIF image

Back to the top