Re: [wtp-dev] Questions on webtools.jsdt.debug repo...

[Michael Rennie <Michael_Rennie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Victor,

1. There is no maintenance branch because nothing has been back-ported. There should probably be a tag though so that master is not used as the 3.5.x build source.
There is an R3_5_0 tag: http://git.eclipse.org/c/jsdt/webtools.jsdt.debug.git/tag/?id=R3_5_0  - I would also expect there to be R3_5_1 and R3_5_2

2. I assumed that building from master worked the same way as it does for the platform - that we do not need to tag anything ourselves. If that is not the case, which it appears you have found is not, then we will have to talk to Carl and find out what the process is.

> Should they be included there (at least for master)?

Yes any commits in master should be built

Michael Rennie

Victor Rubezhny ---09/01/2014 10:11:22 AM---Michael, Thanh, Grand, I have a couple of questions regarding webtools.jsdt.debug repo branches

From: Victor Rubezhny <vrubezhny@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Rennie/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA, thnh.ha@xxxxxxxxxxx, Grant Gayed/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Date: 09/01/2014 10:11 AM
Subject: Questions on webtools.jsdt.debug repo...

---

Michael, Thanh, Grand,

I have a couple of questions regarding webtools.jsdt.debug repo branches 
and commits...

So, why we don't have R3_5_maintenance branch in this repo? Now it looks 
like WTP 3.5.2 (current maintenance) and 3.6 (current development) are 
built using the same master branch. Looks like a bug, isn't it?

And why few latest commits in master aren't included to the 
webtools.maps/releng.jsdt/maps/wst-jsdt.map mapping? Should they be 
included there (at least for master)?

Thanks in advance,
Victor