| RE: [wtp-dev] How to declare that a runtime does not support a facet version? |
|
Hi Konstantin, Thank you for the pointer. I’ll try to take a deeper look and
will comment in the bug. Greetings, Kaloyan From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Konstantin Komissarchik Hi Kaloyan, The quick answer is that this is currently not possible. Please
see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=120376 While this issue has been open for a while, it wasn’t until jpa
2.0 came on the scene that it came to the forefront of everyone’s attention.
Unfortunately this wasn’t identified as a major adopter issue until it was too
late for Helios. It sounds like this is something that we would need to handle
for 3.2.1 or 3.2.2/sr1. An API addition would be necessary, which would require
PMC approval, but I imagine that it would be forthcoming considering that this
has been flagged as an adopter issue. Please take a look at the bug that I referenced. The solution is
well-defined and someone has indicated willingness to contribute a patch. I
think this is a good scenario for someone to learn the framework’s internals
and start contributing, so I’ve been taking a wait and see approach. Of course,
it has been about a month since the last comment on the bug from the potential
contributor. - Konstantin From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Raev, Kaloyan Hi,
I
can declare in the facet framework that a runtime supports certain set of facet
versions. But I cannot find a way to explicitly declare that the runtime does
not support a certain facet version. My
specific problem is with the JPA 2.0 facet version. Our (SAP) runtime does not
support JPA 2.0 yet, only JPA 1.0. I need to declare that the JPA 2.0 facet
version is not a valid one for the SAP runtime. Somehow, the JPA facet is
declared as generally supported and all its versions are assumed supported by
all runtimes. My
goal is to have the following call returns “false”: sapRuntime.supports(<jpa-2.0>); Thanks, Kaloyan Raev |