[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [wtp-dev] JSDT facet gone missing in 3.0.4?
|
I am somewhat tickled by this shoot the messenger mentality. The framework
is telling us that there is a bug in the code and it is telling us where it
is located so that it can be more easily fixed. I honestly do not see how it
would be better to not have known about this problem and shipped 3.0.4 with
a dozen broken extensions referring to a facet that no longer exist.
Regarding moving these messages to the Eclipse trace facility, I would
consider that as a misuse of the facility. The error log is for reporting
problems that plugins run into at runtime, which this case belongs to. The
trace facility is for providing additional verbose output so that one can
better understand operation of code under certain conditions. The Faceted
Project Framework uses both facilities where appropriate.
In all this noise, one important point from my original message has been
overlooked. Far more serious than the error messages in the log is that
there are now users out there with JSDT facet referenced in their project
metadata. Since the JSDT facet was added to the default facets sets for all
server adapters that are part of WTP, I would venture to guess that the
install base is quite considerable. When such users upgrade to 3.0.4, they
are going to end up with problem markers on their projects. Even if the
decision is made that architecturally the JSDT facet is not necessary, the
cat is out of the bag. The only reasonable course of action is to reinstate
the facet for 3.0.4 and figure out how to more gracefully phase it out in
3.1.
Rather than wasting time debating how problems should be reported, lets
concentrate on fixing the actual problem so that we can have a solid 3.0.4
release candidate for adopters to test. So far adopting 3.0.4 has been
rather rough for Oracle products. This is not the only issue we are hitting.
More information to come as we test the build more thoroughly.
- Konstantin
-----Original Message-----
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rob Stryker
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 5:27 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] JSDT facet gone missing in 3.0.4?
The usecase cited by Konstantin as a reason *not* to remove the logging is:
> " but the framework can't tell this case from a typo."
If the "typo" case is the only one cited, then the log message is
primarily to be used for debugging during development. In this case I
believe this should be trace level permanently,
I don't believe "optional" should even be considered, as in all honesty
if a server supports 100 facets, each and every facet is optional. The
server adopter can survive with or without jst.web modules in the
installation, with or without jst.ear modules in the installation, and
with or without my.custom.deploytype in the installation. How can we be
sure it can survive? Because if that facet isn't installed, then that
server adapter will never be asked to deploy it.
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>>> In any case, what is 3.0.4 adopters supposed to do with this bug ?
>>> Is there anything we can do to fix it ?
>>> We got a release coming up in March and would like to use 3.0.4 but
>>> want to be sure we don't flood users logs
>>> with these messages.
>> Looking at this again - then if the only thing the facet framework is
>> doing is logging that there is a missing thing which does not affect
>> any behavior at all shouldn't this be traced instead of error'd ?
>> I still find it really bad JSDT didn't fix this fully, but if the fix
>> would be to lower the logging severity isn't that a better fix ?
> For reference https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=251722 is
> the bug we initially raised this issue in.
> Reducing the logging really sounds to me like the least invasive fix -
> and when the framework once will allow for true optionality *then*
> hard-error'ing about it would be ok.
>
> Any other suggestions ?
>
> /max
>>
>> /max
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Rob Stryker [mailto:rob.stryker@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday,
>>>>> February 03, 2009 8:49 PM
>>>>> To: konstantin.komissarchik@xxxxxxxxxx; General discussion of
>>>>> project-wide or architectural issues.
>>>>> Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] JSDT facet gone missing in 3.0.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this is just crazy talk, but perhaps a server or runtime type
>>>>> expressing "support" for a facet type should not cause error messages
>>>>> like this if the facet type is missing. I know, I know... I'm
>>>>> living in
>>>>> a dream land... but in my thick empty skull I kinda have this notion
>>>>> that "supporting" a facet isn't the same as requiring it.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, I mean, I could be wrong. Maybe there's something in the China
>>>>> water messing with my head. Crazy talk. ... Crazy.
>>>>>
>>>>> ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> - Rob Stryker
>>>>>
>>>>> Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
>>>>>> I just double-checked and despite what is said in Bug 243183, the
>>>>>> JSDT facet is present in Ganymede SR1 (3.0.2) and in 3.0.3. It
>>>>>> has been removed in the 3.1 HEAD stream for a few months now, but
>>>>>> the change in the maintenance stream has happened fairly recently.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> surprised by the number of plugin.xmls that now have to be
>>>>>>> updated to
>>>>>>> prevent this error message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was the result of the desire to have the JSDT facet on by
>>>>>> default when a user targets one of the runtimes that has drivers
>>>>>> shipping with WTP. This meant that this facet had to be
>>>>>> explicitly included in all the default facet sets for all the
>>>>>> various server types. In my opinion, this would have been much
>>>>>> better handled by leaving the facet off by default and having
>>>>>> some way to unobtrusively tell the user that there is additional
>>>>>> functionality available when the user goes to certain contexts.
>>>>>> For instance, if the user opens a javascript file or you detect
>>>>>> javascript in an html/jsp, you could put an "Enable advance
>>>>>> JavaScript support" banner link across the top of the editor.
>>>>>> That's just my two cents on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even if the facet is added back into 3.0.4, is/will there be a
>>>>>>> mechanism
>>>>>>> for deprecating or automatically migrating it out of 3.1 (by M6
>>>>>>> if that's
>>>>>>> the course of action we decide upon)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That depends on what behavior you are after. There is an
>>>>>> enhancement request (Bug 255038) that was recently opened that
>>>>>> would allow facets to be marked as deprecated. In that case you
>>>>>> leave the facet implementation in the code base, but because it
>>>>>> is marked as deprecated it is not visible on projects that don't
>>>>>> have it installed already. Project metadata is not modified
>>>>>> automatically. Other approaches are possible as well, of course.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oracle
>>>>>> Konstantin Komissarchik | Consulting Member of Technical Staff
>>>>>> Phone: +1 425 945 8445 | Mobile: +1 206 898 0611
>>>>>> Oracle Eclipse Tooling
>>>>>> 411 108th Ave NE, Suite 800 | Bellevue, WA 98004
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nitin Dahyabhai
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 6:17 AM
>>>>>> To: wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] JSDT facet gone missing in 3.0.4?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like it was removed in 3.0.2 through bug 243183, and at least
>>>>>> noticed at the latest from bug 21928, but not actually removed
>>>>>> from the
>>>>>> server tools plug-ins. I regret how poorly this was handled, and am
>>>>>> surprised by the number of plugin.xmls that now have to be
>>>>>> updated to
>>>>>> prevent this error message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if the facet is added back into 3.0.4, is/will there be a
>>>>>> mechanism
>>>>>> for deprecating or automatically migrating it out of 3.1 (by M6
>>>>>> if that's
>>>>>> the course of action we decide upon)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Nitin Dahyabhai
>>>>>> Eclipse WTP Source Editing
>>>>>> IBM Rational
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> wtp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> wtp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wtp-dev mailing list
>>>> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wtp-dev mailing list
>>> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wtp-dev mailing list
>> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
