|Re: [wtp-dev] Action required for adopters of org.eclipse.wst.wsdl for WTP 3.1 M5|
> ... if the new version is still backwards compatible with the old version
> ... I would go as far to set the upper bound to 2.0 in both cases, but I'm more liberal that way.
I think one hard part to balance, in this area, is that the third party jars (and hence the tools that build on them)
don't follow the exact same conventions as we do in Eclipse/OSGi land, or at least not as rigorously.
And that's what has led to this conservative version ranges for cases like this.
But, I'm more conservative that way. :)
David Carver ---01/14/2009 02:34:02 PM---Amy Wu wrote: >
David Carver <dcarver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
01/14/2009 02:34 PM
Re: [wtp-dev] Action required for adopters of org.eclipse.wst.wsdl for WTP 3.1 M5