[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build S-3.1M2-20080928142920/
|
The issue is there is that there are
random Junit failures every now and then on the build machine that happens
when no changes are released or they pass when ran locally, and we've given
these a by in the past.
But you're right, we should have more
successful build and pay more attention to these Junit failures especially
since there hasn't been a Junit error free build on the 3.1 stream for
a while.
I'll be opening bugs for every Junit
failures that I see on the builds in hopes to achieve 0 Junit failing builds
again.
Lets use this week M3 planning week
and fixes all of these issues.
Regards,
Helen Zhang PMP®
Rational Architecture Management Project Management Office
Eclipse Webtools Platform (WTP)
IBM Toronto Software Lab | 8200 Warden Ave. | Markham | L6G 1C7
Email: hjzhang@xxxxxxxxxx | Phone: 905-413-3443 | T/L: 969-3443
David Carver <dcarver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/29/2008 11:37 AM
|
Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "General discussion of project-wide
or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [wtp-dev] Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build
S-3.1M2-20080928142920/ |
|
A more general concern from an adopter and down stream
project stand
point. How can builds be declared that aren't passing all their unit
tests. It's goes against the fundamentals of having a clean build,
if
you declare a "stable" build that has failing unit tests.
How do I know as an adopter or a dependency on a project that it is a
good build, if the build is never green. It's been a concern
that I
don't think has been adequately addressed. Especially if you
take a
look at the cruise control server and the status of the builds for the
last several weeks.
http://build.eclipse.org:7777/dashboard/tab/dashboard
Dave
Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> So what's the story with the DTP version referenced by our 3.1 stream?
> We are currently referencing dtp-sdk-1.6.1RC3-200809191336
> <http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/datatools/downloads/drops/N_DTP_1.6.1/dtp-sdk-1.6.1RC3-200809191336.zip>
while
> 3.0.2 shipped with 1.6.1 proper. I poked around on DTP download page
> and haven't found anything like 1.7 M2. There is a 1.6.2 that is in
> progress by the looks of it. Does anyone know what DTP team is
> planning for Galileo?
>
> - Konstantin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Helen Zhang
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 28, 2008 9:02 PM
> *To:* General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
> *Subject:* [wtp-dev] Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build S-3.1M2-20080928142920/
>
>
> *Declaring WTP 3.1 M2 build *S-3.1M2-20080928142920/
> *
> Build*
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.1/S-3.1M2-20080928142920/
> *
> Smoketest Results*
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_Smoke_Test_Results_R31_092508
>
> *Regards,*
>
> Helen Zhang *PMP®
> Rational Architecture Management Project Management Office
> Eclipse Webtools Platform (WTP) **
> IBM Toronto Software Lab | 8200 Warden Ave. | Markham | L6G 1C7
> Email: hjzhang@xxxxxxxxxx | Phone: 905-413-3443 | T/L: 969-3443*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
