|RE: [wtp-dev] New name for the Deployment Descriptor tree for JavaEE 5 projects|
For the moment our goal is to add Web Services related artifacts under the Session Bean nodes.
But, yes, it could be a case in the future that JPA artifacts are added as well under the Entity Bean nodes.
So, the work "module" is not appropriate to be in the label name. Do you have your own suggestion?
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Fullbright
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:17 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] New name for the Deployment Descriptor tree for JavaEE 5 projects
Since JPA is not a "module" (and hopefully at one point will be a facet configurable without a "module"), I would cast my preference towards a term which does not include that word. That is, if JPA artifacts are intended to also use this node in the tree in which to display their information. Is that the intention?
-- Paul Fullbright Oracle Corp. Eclipse Dali/Java Persistence Tools Development paul.fullbright@xxxxxxxxxx
Raev, Kaloyan wrote:
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature