David should correct my memory, but the
way I remember the policy being stated in the last several dev meetings is... a
fix can be released with only one PMC member approving, but the committer
should be ready to rollback if other PMC members object when they get a chance
to review. Whether that’s a good policy or not is a separate question.
- Konstantin
From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006
2:12 PM
To: General discussion of
project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: General discussion of
project-wide or architectural issues.; wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC
approvals for J2EE defects
Chuck,
I
think it depends on where we are in the cycle. If we are approaching a deadline
then we need rapid response. However, as far as I understand, we still require
3 +1 votes. The note requesting approval is timestamped 10/09/2006 03:16 PM and
when I reviewed the bugs, far less than 24 hours had elapsed. I think 48 hours
is reasonable for business as usual. In my case, yesterday was a holiday in Canada so I
didn't see the request until this morning. Also, some PMC members were travelling
to the Eclipse Summit today. Let's give people a fair chance to comment on the
bugs before they are released.
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
Chuck Bridgham
<cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 04:28 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
Well we were told we could release because in the past getting 3 votes wasn't
timely....
Maybe some clarification is needed.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)
|
Arthur Ryman
<ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/10/2006 04:18 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
Chuck,
I've been reviewing these bugs and noticed that they are being released based
on a single vote from David. I thought we required 3 votes. Has the process
changed?
Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division
blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
|
Chuck Bridgham
<cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/09/2006 03:16 PM
|
Please
respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"General discussion of project-wide or
architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[wtp-dev] Request PMC approvals for J2EE
defects
|
|
The J2EE Team here in RTP has several defect ready for PMC review:
158619 maj P2
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC performance
[project creation] Need default setting for java
output f...
158623 cri P1
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[performance] ComponentDeployable members() to
recognize ...
158825 cri P1
jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
wst.comm 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[emfWorkbench] Use of EMF2DOMAdapterImpl now requires OSGI
159026 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx tjbishop@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC
[hotbug][j2ee] 'EAR Libraries' does not include JAR files...
159158 cri P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[j2ee] InvertClientJARDependencyCompoundOperation throwin...
159160 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx deboer@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[import/export] J2EE module import adds invalid reference
160019 maj P2
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152
PMC performance
[modulecore] Problem with DependencyGraph timestamp checking
160226 maj P2
jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx
ASSI
jst.j2ee 1.5.2 M152 PMC
[modulecore] VirtualComponent: Concurrent Modification Ex...
links are below:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158619
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158623
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=158825
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159026
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159158
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159160
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160019
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160226
Each defect has an explaination of the problem for justification, and also a
detailed explaination of the fix involved.
These defects/patches have already undergone internal review and testing, and
we'll be glad to provide any additional details if required.
Thanks - Chuck
Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle
Park, NC
Email: cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
