[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs


Ian,

IMHO, If the bug applies to both streams that you can verify it on the 1.5 stream. Say which stream you verified in your comment. If you believe the fix only applies to 1.0 then verify it there.

We should be focusing on 1.5.1 now. I don't believe we have any more 1.0 maintenance releases planned (someone correct me if I'm wrong).

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx



"Ian Trimble" <ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/22/2006 04:34 PM

Please respond to
"ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.trimble@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs





Is it incorrect to mark a bug VERIFIED against yesterday's 1.5.x build when the bug is targeted to the 1.0.x stream? Should I verify with both a 1.0.x build AND a 1.5.x build?
 
Thanks,
 - Ian
-----Original Message-----
From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent:
Friday, September 22, 2006 11:57 AM
To:
raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx; General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc:
General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.; wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs


Raghu,


Thx. Please mark it as VERIFIED since you are acting as the reporter. Let the bug owner CLOSE it.


Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx


"raghunathan srinivasan" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/22/2006 01:36 PM

Please respond to
"raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx" <raghunathan.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs







Hi,

 
The JSF Tools project would like to help in verifying the bugs. We will pick the blocker/critical  bugs in a component (jst.j2ee) and put the tag, ‘Verifying’ in the Status Whiteboard to flag the bugs we are working on. I am assuming we can mark the bug as closed once we successfully verify the bug.

 
Suggestions / objections?

-Raghu





From:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent:
Friday, September 22, 2006 6:43 AM
To:
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[wtp-dev] Please verify these worst fixed bugs

 

Component Leads,

These is the query, by component, for blocker, critical, and major bugs marked as "fixed" ... these are the most important to verify by Tuesday.
Please don't wait for the "originator" for these, we need someone ... anyone .... to verify that they really are fixed.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_severity&y_axis_field=component&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=WebTools&product=Web+Tools&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&format=table&action="">



Reminder: bugs in the REMIND or LATER state should not be verified ... those are "holding" states. .... Well, I guess even "remind" could be closed if over 6 months old, or so.

I did not include dup's, worksforme, or invalid in above query simply because these "fixed" ones are most important. Feel free to also verify dup's, worksforme, and invalid resolutions after 'fixed' ones.

 
Severity
Component  


  blocker critical major Total
J2EE Standard Tools
.
1
6
7
Web Standard Tools
.
.
3
3
documentation
.
.
3
3
jst.ejb
1
1
7
9
jst.j2ee
6
jst.jsp
.
4
jst.server
1
1
jst.servlet
.
1
4
5
jst.ws
.
3
releng
4
1
4
9
website
.
.
1
1
wst.common
1
wst.css
.
.
2
2
wst.dtd
.
1
.
1
wst.html
.
1
3
4
wst.internet
.
.
1
1
wst.rdb
.
5
wst.server
3
9
wst.sse
.
.
7
7
wst.validation
.
2
5
7
wst.web
.
4
3
7
wst.ws
1
1
5
7
wst.wsdl
.
5
wst.xml
.
4
wst.xsd
.
3
Total


_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev