Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-dev] RE: Facets

I looked at OSGi syntax before implementing this, but it just wasn’t flexible enough so I chose to borrow ideas from it instead of adopting it verbatim. Regarding your suggestion to change the meaning of comma from ‘or’ to ‘and’ depending on the context that’s it is used in, I think that would cause more confusion than it would solve.

 

- Konstantin

 


From: Michael Elder [mailto:mdelder@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 6:48 AM
To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Cc: Konstantin Komissarchik; wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] RE: Facets

 


Hi Kosta,

        I think that this kind of error is likely to be repeated with many developers. I think it would make more sense for [  or ( x , y , ) or ] style notation to mimic the OSGi standard used by Eclipse. I think allowing a comma (",") to be "or" outside of brackets or parenthesis is still okay; but the [(x , y)] being interpretted as two independent units "[(x" and "y)]" just isn't intuitive.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind Regards,

Michael D. Elder
Rational Studio / Services Tools Development    
IBM RTP Lab
Ext: (919) 543-8356
T/L:  441-8356
mdelder@xxxxxxxxxx



Kevin Bauer/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/07/2006 06:18 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

"Konstantin Komissarchik" <kosta@xxxxxxx>

cc

wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Subject

[wtp-dev] RE: Facets

 

 

 




Konstantin,
 
I will give that a try.  I did not get that , meant or.  I was thinking of the eclipse plugin dependency ranges.
 
Thanks,
 
Kevin
 
Friday, April 07, 2006 6:13 PM
To: Kevin Bauer/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc: <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Konstantin Komissarchik" <kosta@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Facets


Kevin,
 
_expression_ “[2.3, 2.4]” means “greater than or equal to 2.3 or less than or equal to 2.4”. That matches 2.2. What are you trying to represent. The direct translation of “&gt:2.3” is “[2.3”. Perhaps you were trying for “[2.3-2.4]”...
 
- Konstantin
 

 



From: Kevin Bauer [mailto:kmbauer@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:37 PM
To:
Konstantin Komissarchik
Cc:
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Facets

 

Konstantin,


I have a build based on a
200603302119-200603302119 version of WTP.  In my build my facets started giving me messages like...

The ">", ">=", "<", and "<=" notation in version expressions has been deprecated. It used in plugin com.ibm.etools.myplugin. Note that the angle brackets are represented via "&lt;" and "&gt;" in the plugin.xml files. The functionality has been replaced with range notation. For instance "[X-Y)" means all versions greater or equals to X and less than Y. Open ranges such as "(X" or "Y]" are also allowed.


However I changed my facet from...


   <constraint>

       <requires facet="jst.web" version="&gt;=2.3"/>

   </constraint>


To...


   <constraint>

       <requires facet="jst.web" version="[2.3, 2.4]"/>

   </constraint>


and it no longer indicated that a 2.2 web project was invalid.  Has this been addressed?  If so in what build?


Thanks,


Kevin Bauer

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

Back to the top