[wtp-dev] Committes: please review via Bugzilla - are we not ready to de

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for the late send, but at status
meeting, we need to review the following bugs.

If you can do any triage before the
meeting, please do so. 

As a general rule, 
A. should only have target of M8 if
fixed in M8. 
B. Should only have a P1 priority if
developers considered it "stop ship". 
C. Blockers should have some "response
from developer" in them that 
others (such as me) can review to know
why we should not postpone
declaring milestone (or, if we should,
but then develper should 
move to P1). 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 


1. target of M8

125  webtools bugs that are "new,
assigned, reopened" that are have a target of M8. 
 
I'm guessing most of those simply should
have their targets moved to "unspecified" or "M9"?



2. target of M8 that are have blocking
or criticial severify

Do we need to postpone M8 to deliever
these? 


110326
blo P3 jlanuti@xxxxxxxxxx jialin@xxxxxxxxxx NEW jst.j2ee 1.0 0 1.0 M8 webservice
handler and SOAP do not show up
110229
blo P3 lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx balakuma@xxxxxxxxxx NEW wst.comm 1.0 0 1.0 M8
NoClassDefFoundError for URIResolverPlugin class in headless mode 
109758
blo P3 jsholl@xxxxxxxxxx balakuma@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI jst.j2ee 1.0 0 1.0 M8
trying to get ejb artifact edit hangs 
103253 blo P4 dpchou@xxxxxxxxxx
theivend@xxxxxxxxxx NEW wst.rdb 0.7 0 1.0 M8 Vendor model needs to model
different identifier limits 
103348 cri P2 mdelder@xxxxxxxxxx
eclipsebugs@xxxxxxx NEW wst.comm 1.0 5 1.0 M8 NullPointerException in TabbedPropertyRegistry

108166 cri P3 mdelder@xxxxxxxxxx
dmisic@xxxxxxxxxx NEW wst.comm 0.7 0 1.0 M8 Problems with the Tabbed Properties
View framework and Project Explorer (Common Navigator) integration 
106808 cri P3 cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
jljlmatu@xxxxxxxxxx REOP J2EE Sta 0.7 0 1.0 M8 ComponentUtilities#findComponent
should support non existing IResoruce 
105201
cri P4 naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx nagrawal@xxxxxxxxxx ASSI jst.j2ee unspe 0
1.0 M8 Usability issues with ejbdoclet preference 


3. open bugs that are "blocker or criticial"

there are 32 of these (some overlap with above list in
'2'). 

Can we declare M8 without them? 

4. open bugs that are "P1" 

There are 5 of these, 3 normal, 2 major. 

Can we declare M8 without them?