Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [wtp-dev] Why Do We Need the Preference to Enable Multiple Modules per Project?


Robert,

Yes. I'll do that.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/



Robert Sanheim <rsanheim@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/07/2005 10:27 AM

Please respond to
Robert Sanheim and "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [wtp-dev] Why Do We Need the Preference to Enable Multiple        Modules per Project?





On 7/7/05, Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
> While using WTP to develop some Web apps, I ran into a feature of our UI
> that I find problematic, and I'd like to hear from other people about why we
> need this feature.
>  
> The feature is the Flexible Project Preference. The user now has to
> explicity check a box to enable multiple modules per project.
>  
> I find this problematic for several reasons:
>  
> 1. It caused a usability problem. I created a project with a Web module in
> an earlier build of WTP and then worked on it with a later build which has
> this preference disabled. It caused the Web service wizard to fail [1]. This
> will be corrected, but it pointed out to me that this preference is causing
> bimodal behavior. Our code in now more complex than it needs to be and there
> is more potential for bugs and usability problems.
>  
> 2. We went to a lot a development effort to upgrade the code base to allow
> multiple modules per project. This should be the WTP norm. We should promote
> this feature and improve our UI to make it very easy for users. Disabling it
> seems like a step backwards and an admission of failure.
>  
[snip]...

Shouldn't this be posted to the general WTP newsgroup to get some
feedback from users who may not be following the dev mailing list?

- Rob Sanheim
--
http://www.robsanheim.com/
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


Back to the top