Re: [wtp-dev] SDK builds.

[Arthur Ryman <ryman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think a single WDE feature is the
simplest way to go. Use this for any code that is useful to WTP plug-in
developers. Maybe this is where our Javadoc should go.

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@xxxxxxx
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/

Timothy Deboer/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/12/2005 09:57 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To	"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] SDK builds.

Hi Naci, 

I agree, but it may be overkill to create a new WDE if we're the only team
that plans to have content. (STDE - server tools development environment?
:) ) I'd also like to get this code checked in and available for this milestone
if possible, so that we can get some feedback and help out external teams
that are building servers. 

Does anyone else have any comments? If we do start a WDE, how do we begin
- bugzilla against releng to create the features & packaging?

Thanks, 
Tim deBoer
WebSphere Tools - IBM Canada Ltd.
(905) 413-3503  (tieline 969)
deboer@xxxxxxxxxx

Naci Dai <naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/11/2005 07:19 PM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To	gercan@xxxxxxx, "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [wtp-dev] SDK builds.

It sounds like this plugin is a tool for people who would extend wtp, but
not a part of wtp runtime.  Therefore wtp-sdk is not a good place
for 
it.  SDK is wtp with "sources".

However, we can have a sub-component for  WDE, wtp-development-environment
:-), not totally unlike PDE, where this could live.  It is also possible
to 
have a seperately downloadble component at the downloads page.



At 01:56 AM 4/12/2005, you wrote:

>Hello everyone,
>I have been working on a PDE template plug-in for server tooling.(An
>improved version of what we had in eclipsecon demo). I am going to
check 
>in this into CVS, but I am not sure if this plugin should become a
part of 
>the regular WTP distro, since it has no real benefit to users and it
adds 
>a dependency to the PDE. But the SDK builds can be a suitable place
for 
>this and plugins with similar purposes. Unfortunately SDK builds are
not 
>different from regular builds they basically include the source. Should
>two builds differentiate so that SDK build may accommodate plugins
such as 
>this one, or keeping this plugin in CVS and distributing it from there
is 
>the best we can do?
>
>Gorkem Ercan.
>_______________________________________________
>wtp-dev mailing list
>wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

Naci Dai,
Managing Director

eteration a.s.
Inonu cad. Sumer sok. Zitas D1-15
Kozyatagi, Istanbul 81090
+90 (532) 573 7783 (cell)
+90 (216) 361 5434 (phone)
+90 (216) 361 2034 (fax)
http://www.eteration.com
mailto:nacidai@xxxxxxx
mailto:naci@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev