Re: [wtp-dev] More Renames for Common navigator in HEAD

[Mark Diggory <mdiggory@xxxxxxxxx>]

Is the common navigator planned to always have the dependency on JEM and 
JDT? Or are there efforts to factor this out into the JST? I notice 
there are a number of dependencies that are a little weak. Such as 
dependency on a "Logger" class in JEM. Logging could go directly to the 
Eclipse logger, dependencies like this cause large libraries (JDT) to 
have to be present just to use Common Navigator. Seems as though the 
CommonNavigator and the WorkbenchNavigator extension should really be 
weaned of such dependencies. I'd recommend that the two be refactored to 
function on just the Eclipse Platform runtime and not the full Eclipse SDK.

-Mark Diggory

Chuck Bridgham wrote:

> The following classes have moved to internal.provisional
>
> org.eclipse.wst.common.navigator.views  -> 
>  org.eclipse.wst.common.navigator.internal.provisional.views
> AdaptabilityUtility.java
> CommonActivitiesUtilities.java
> CommonNavigator.java
> CommonNavigatorManager.java
> CommonSorter.java
> CommonViewer.java
> ICommonActionProvider.java
> ICommonDropActionDelegate.java
> ICommonLabelProvider.java
> ICommonMenuConstants.java
> ICommonOpenListener.java
> ILinkHelper.java
> INavigatorContentExtension.java
> INavigatorContentProvider.java
> INavigatorExtensionFilter.java
> NavigatorActionService.java
> NavigatorContentService.java
> NavigatorContentServiceContentProvider.java
> NavigatorContentServiceLabelProvider.java
> Priority.java
>
> Thanks - Chuck
>
> Rational J2EE Tooling Team Lead
> IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC
> Email:  cbridgha@xxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 919-254-1848 (T/L: 444)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-dev mailing list
> wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
>