Re: [wtp-dev] Lomboz doco/confusion

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the feedback. Just to clarify,
the exercise isn't exactly to pick one or the other, but see the charms
of each (or not so charming things). For example, while IBM's project structure
is "easy to use" and get running with Tomcat ... its the only
project structure there is! There's other servers, and some clients with
pre-existing projects that require more flexibility, even if it means re-deploying
to run. So, these are definitely the issues we like to hear about, and
I'm sure will be having many discussions about how to trade-off various
aspects of each.  Thanks again.

"Jeff Broberg" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/27/2004 07:51 PM

Please respond to
wtp-dev

To	<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] Lomboz doco/confusion

Having gone through the IBM contribution,
tutorial etc, I was pretty happy.  Then I decided to try out Lomboz.
 Needless to say, I am not as impressed or excited.  The doco
is extremely confusing, and I am unclear as to the true advantage of the
contribution.  It would appear that just using the IBM pluggins allow
me to easily create web applications that are dynamically loaded into Tomcat,
etc.  But Lomboz moves the other direction and forces ( or the doc
seems to indicate ) me to do a redeploy after each change.  Also,
why doesnt Lomboz use the new Browser view for debugging, etc.  
 
Please let me know if I have misinterpreted
the intent of Lomboz, but it seems like a step backwards.
 
Jeff
 
P.S.  Is there an easy way to de-install
the Lomboz pluggins, or do I just remove the dirs ?

---

My mailbox is spam-free with ChoiceMail, the leader in
personal and corporate anti-spam solutions. Download your free copy of
ChoiceMail from www.choicemailfree.com.