[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [vtp-dev] New versions - SCXML?
|
Title: Message
I also
agree SCXML will be a great addition.
thanks
Jayant
I think it's a great candidate, as it isn't that big of an incremental
cost to add the editing support, and there is an OSS engine project:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice
Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex
things should be possible." - Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2006 06:28 PM
Please respond
to Voice Tools general developers
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Voice Tools general developers"
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New versions -
SCXML? |
|
Should we be thinking about support for SCXML? That is
rolling down the pike.
-- Mike
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yakulis, Ross
(Ross)
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:31 PM
To: Voice
Tools general developers
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
Right exactly, same for Avaya tools you can do either
vxml app only or
ccxml and
vxml. I was just curious if any one really uses
the <script> tag in ccxml and was
searching for "real" ccxml
apps.
Thanks,
Ross
-----Original
Message-----
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brent D
Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:30 PM
To:
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
I haven't personally, but it appears to
be the W3C's direction for standardizing call control. From the VTP
perspective, it costs us very little resource to support editing CCXML on top
of VoiceXML&SRGSXML so it is at worst unused functionality by those who
don't need/want it. If someone used the VTP as a base but didn't care for
CCXML they could just remove it by taking away the plugins.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice
Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex
things should be possible." - Alan Kay
"Yakulis, Ross \(Ross\)"
<yakulis@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2006 03:09 PM
|
To
| Brent D Metz/Boca
Raton/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New
versions |
|
Have you ever seen any "real world" ccxml applications.
Everything
I see on the net are just "toy" ccxml
applications.
Ross Yakulis
(Avaya).
-----Original Message-----
From:
vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:04
PM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: RE:
[vtp-dev] New versions
I'll change the dailies
to build and pre-req 1.0.1 to get started.
--
Brent D.
Metz
Enterprise Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should
be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2006 01:33 PM
Please respond
to Voice Tools general developers
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Voice Tools general
developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New
versions |
|
No, I have seen no issues with WTP 1.0.1. But I really don’t
exercise much of it.
--
Mike
From:
vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:36
AM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: Re:
[vtp-dev] New versions
Since we're 'off plan' at this
point I'd like to get more feedback from those on the list on what would go
into a new cycle. I can think of a few things that could be done ahead of new
major features:
- Defect resolution (not many on the
books)
- Compatibility with WTP 1.0.1 (So far there hasn't been many
problems)
Mike, have you noticed any issues with 1.0.1? I
haven't.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice
Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex
things should be possible." - Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/09/2006 09:41 PM
Please respond
to Voice Tools general developers
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Voice Tools general
developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [vtp-dev] New
versions |
|
I have made a couple of changes to the Tellme browser
plug-in since the release candidate was done.
It would be great to
have those changes incorporated into the candidate. One thing I added is a
marker on the https requests to Studio so I can track how much Studio activity
we are getting from VTP – don’t know why I did not think of that
sooner.
Also, I suppose it is about time to roll to a new version for
the plug-ins, 1.0.1.
-- Mike_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing
list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev_______________________________________________
vtp-dev
mailing
list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing
list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev