[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- From: "Philippe Ombredanne" <pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:53:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: ve-dev@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:importance; bh=sZHJ1RHB0xC9brsKZ+97bIGg63GboMV/11j8P5sRYzc=; b=nfmDjlxUcdxhDKxHywQdsiDvyi9oedZUh+j3Rei30F0Kecyd/+AgDcUk3a9TmXynW7yJnCz5T+XWclCes31L05vgoGLzoqXxXTlf/TDaM8QWUmAPz7whrTnEHC2T7hbhMEEb6ow3ySOTSq4cgR3PVShGck4ifzU9Ca/QVZv6cCQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:importance; b=I+SlFPQzVLZcAeRIjSOYFZ7csvEOWAw+VEmihH6PQt/r4NU4FWpD6+wdHJwDM0D8wPbPyht6DDNKj9VzcD62BgXXqrBgK9hSsLxwKkiu/98ldBORKLZr3bUNUjBs4sGOFcaC0UY9BxNJ5QO4pEvgKFj8b/IH0WUw3KqHyw3Afjg=
- Importance: Normal
Jeff Myers wrote:
> Did you intentionally leave out VE's Swing support as one of the areas
> of project focus?
>Or did you forget to mention it when you talked
> about continuing to focus on what the VE currently does?
> I'd be very disappointed if VE's Swing support was discontinued... I
> think that's what most users (including myself) use it for primarily.
That was an oversight. A freudian slip may be :-D
Could you add it to the wiki page?
And the reason to put a roadmap is eactly for that.
We could in fact create a survey on survey monkey and ask the community
for feedbacck.
Could you help there?
I would be interested to know where we should go next!
>
> On 10/11/07, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I started a wiki page with an embryonic VE Roadmap.
> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/VE/Roadmap
> > Feedback and additions are welcomed.
> > One of the important decision to make is the project focus.
> > We could go SWT only, or continue to ebrace any kind of
> Visual editing
> > which is the project original charter, and which I like.
> > Especially with the needs expressed by adopters to have RCP
> support and
> > support for non-java targets (Like Cathy's awesome Groovy VE).
> >
> > Feedback?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Philippe
> >
> > http://easyeclipse.org - http://phpeclipse.net -
> http://eclipse.org/atf
> > -
> > http://eclipse.org/vep - http://labs.jboss.org/drools/ -
> > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner
> > philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com
> > nexB - Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ve-dev mailing list
> > ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ve-dev
> >
>