Re: [ve-dev] Approve two bug fixes for 1.0.2

[Jeff Myers <myersj@xxxxxxxxx>]

I discussed this with Seth yesterday and it does seem like it'd
function much better as a toggle on the toolbar.  I'll see about
implementing this, but it won't be for 1.0.2.

 - Jeff


On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:23:48 -0400, Rich Kulp <richkulp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
> I thought a little more about it, and I think it actually needs to be a
> toggle on the toolbar. I don't know if someone would want it always off. it
> would be annoying to have to close the editor and change the preference and
> open it again. but that is too much for 1.0.2. 
>  
> thoughts anyone? 
>  
> Rich 
>  
>  
>  
>  Dr Gili Mendel/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
> Sent by: ve-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 10/15/2004 08:18 AM 
>  
> Please respond to
>  ve-dev 
>  
>  
> To ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>  
> cc 
>  
> Subject Re: [ve-dev] Approve two bug fixes for 1.0.2 
>  
>  
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  We should try and limit defects for 1.0.2 for stability/consistency
> reasons. Though, we should plan for a test pass before we release the 1.0.2
> driver.  This is since our focus (and HEAD) is going to move to the 1.1
> release with breaking changes thereafter. 
>  
>  This feature (48554 ) has been asked for multiple times... as a matter of
> fact, it was considered a "bug".   Given the low risk, and the availability
> of a fix from Jeff... I'll vote to let it in.  The UI change is quiet small
> ... doubt that an extra check box will throw a users off to the point that
> we need to wait another release.... This is an open source project, and if
> someone wants something really bad, to the point that they are willing to
> put the time/effort to get the code available, and if it will not impact the
> stability of a delivery, and does not change any semantics... I'll say
> "bring it on":-) 
>  
>  
>  ------------
>  Dr. Gili Mendel
>  IBM
>  Software Development
>  RTP Raleigh, NC
>  (919)543 6408, tie: 441 6408
>  
>  
>  
>  Peter Walker/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS 
>  Sent by: ve-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 10/14/2004 01:53 PM 
>  
>  
> Please respond to
>  ve-dev 
> 
>  
>  
> To ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>  
> cc ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ve-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>  
> Subject Re: [ve-dev] Approve two bug fixes for 1.0.2 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  Jeff, 
>  I would recommend commiting 73117 for the 1.0.2 maintenance build
> (currently HEAD) since it's for critical, blocker bugs. But hold off 48554
> for the 1.1 (or 1.5?) development.work which will be HEAD once we GA 1.0.2.
> The reason for this is this bug is more of an enhancement and affects the UI
> visually, requiring NL and documentation changes. 
>  
>  Thanks...
>  
>  Peter Walker
>  -------------------------------------
>  Eclipse JVE Development
>  919-254-1558 - T/L 444, Fax 254-8169, HYSA/501/K107
>  IBM SWG at RTP, 3039 Cornwallis Rd, RTP, NC 27709
>  Lotus Notes: Peter Walker/Raleigh/IBM   Internet: walkerp@xxxxxxxxxx 
>  
>  Jeff Myers <myersj@xxxxxxxxx> 
>  Sent by: ve-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 10/14/2004 11:56 AM 
>  
>  
> Please respond to
>  ve-dev 
>  
>  
>  
> To ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>  
> cc 
>  
> Subject [ve-dev] Approve two bug fixes for 1.0.2 
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  Greetings all,
>  
>  I've got bug fixes for bugs 48554 and 73117 sitting in my workspace. 
>  Can either of these or both be committed into the 1.0.2 stream?
>  
>  My fix for 48554 involves adding a check box to the Visual Editor's
>  preference page that says "Show borders around invisible components"
>  that is checked by default.  Unchecking this box disables drawing
>  outline borders around all edit parts, which makes the VE's design
>  view reflect the runtime view exactly.
>  
>  - Jeff
>  _______________________________________________
>  ve-dev mailing list
>  ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ve-dev
>  
>