Re: [tools-pmc] Eclipse LDT and Oxygen

[Simon Bernard <sbernard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

  Sorry again, I didn't understood questions was for me.

  I will try to explain the situation :

  LDT project is not really supported by SierraWireless anymore.
  There is no more active committers.
  Metalua project on which LDT is based is not active anymore.
  I'm the last "active" members of the LDT team but it's difficult to 
find time and motivation in this condition.
  As there is still some users of LDT (~80 000 download last years), I 
try to continue to do some bug fixes and to integrate LDT in release 
train but I missed to declare the LDT participation in Oxygen in time :/.

Simon


Le 05/04/2017 à 18:57, David Williams a écrit :
> As far as I am concerned, we should consider the matter closed, with 
> approval -- but, others may expect more.
>
> Here is the history as I know it:
> Wayne proactively petitioned the PC in February:
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg02684.html 
>
>
> Since he mentioned " ... supposed to have PMC approval ..." I posted 
> my approval in
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03939.html
> as did Roland, in
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03942.html
> Alex gave his approval (with a question) in
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03940.html
> And Doug gave his approval sort asking for the LDT project to say more 
> ...
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03941.html
>
> My guess is the LDT project does not follow the PMC list, so if PMC 
> members had questions, I think they should follow up by posting their 
> questions to the ldt-dev list.
>
> Wayne did post one message to that list at
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00086.html
> with one small reply at
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00087.html
>
> Unless others want more, I think all these message imply "awareness 
> and approval" and no need to force more process than that.
>
> And ... perhaps we (our Planning Council Rep :) can participate more 
> formally in the future.
>
> If anyone expects more, please say so and follow up as needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> On 04/05/2017 12:06 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> > I would if the LDT gang would feed me what I need to say. I haven¹t been
> > following the issue.
> >
> > Doug.
> >
> > On 2017-04-03, 4:41 PM, "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of 
> > Wayne
> > Beaton" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > AFAICT, the Eclipse Tools PMC has not actually brought a petition for
> > > Eclipse LDT  to participate in the Eclipse Oxygen simultaneous release
> > > to the Eclipse Planning Council.
> > >
> > > I believe that this is just a technicality, as Eclipse LDT has been
> > > participating in the build since before M4.
> > >
> > > Assuming that I haven't missed something important, can the Eclipse
> > > Tools PMC's Planning Council representative please add this to the 
> > > agenda?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Wayne
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Wayne Beaton
> > > @waynebeaton
> > > The Eclipse Foundation
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tools-pmc mailing list
> > > tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > >from this list, visit
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
> > _______________________________________________
> > tools-pmc mailing list
> > tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or 
> > unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or 
> unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc