Greetings Tools PMC,
We have another significant contribution (by the same contributor, actually) to be contributed to TCF:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/45860/
Gerrit counts 5336 lines.
It was written 100% by employees of the same company as the committer (Wind River), and a Member Committer Agreement is in place.
Also, the contributor is committer on CDT (but not yet on TCF) and knows the IP Rules.
We’ll look at making the contributor a committer to the project to avoid burdening the PMC moving forward,
But for now we request another +1 for a contribution as per page 1 / figure 2 of the Eclipse Legal Process
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
I can confirm that the contribution is needed for the project, and we have observed due diligence guidelines as every committer would do.
Thanks !
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools,
Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 2:35 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] TCF Contribution "under the supervision of the PMC"
+1
Sounds ok by me. Seems to meet the spirit of the rule.
Other PMC members, please say if you'd like to meet (on phone) to discuss this or other topics ... tomorrow, 1/14 is the "Second Wednesday" of the Month, when we'd normally have a meeting, if there
is an agenda.
Please say if anyone wants that meeting for this, or other topics.
Thanks,
From: "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cc: "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stieber,
Uwe" <Uwe.Stieber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx" <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/13/2015 04:27 AM
Subject: [tools-pmc] TCF Contribution "under the supervision of the PMC"
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Tools PMC,
For the TCF Project, we would like to commit following contribution:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/38323/
This contribution is 4283 lines of code. It was written 100% by employees of the same company as the committer (Wind River), and a Member Committer Agreement is in place. Also, the contributor
is committer on CDT (but not yet on TCF).
According to Legal Process Poster:
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
page 1 / figure2 we should be able to commit this without extra due diligence effort on the IP team, if the PMC agrees this is OK (see also page 3).
I can confirm that the contribution is needed for the project, and we have observed due diligence guidelines as every committer would do.
Do you agree we can commit this without putting extra burden on the IP team ?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools,
Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
