[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tools-pmc] TCF Contribution "under the supervision of the PMC"
|
+1. Supervision is pretty ill defined but if you are representing the code
and can vouch for it¹s IP cleanliness, I¹m OK with it.
Little confused why it would take that much code to adapt o.e.remote to
TCF, but we can reserve that discussion for the project mailing list.
Doug.
On 2015-01-13, 9:01 AM, "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David M Williams" <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Tools PMC mailing list" <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 3:35:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] TCF Contribution "under the supervision of the
>>PMC"
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Sounds ok by me. Seems to meet the spirit of the rule.
>
>+1 from me too.
>
>>
>> Other PMC members, please say if you'd like to meet (on phone) to
>>discuss
>> this or other topics ... tomorrow, 1/14 is the "Second Wednesday" of the
>> Month, when we'd normally have a meeting, if there is an agenda.
>>
>> Please say if anyone wants that meeting for this, or other topics.
>
>I have nothing for this meeting.
>
>Alexander Kurtakov
>Red Hat Eclipse team
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Cc: "Schorn, Markus" <Markus.Schorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stieber, Uwe"
>> <Uwe.Stieber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx"
>> <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 01/13/2015 04:27 AM
>> Subject: [tools-pmc] TCF Contribution "under the supervision of the PMC"
>> Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Tools PMC,
>>
>> For the TCF Project, we would like to commit following contribution:
>>
>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/38323/
>>
>> This contribution is 4283 lines of code. It was written 100% by
>>employees of
>> the same company as the committer (Wind River), and a Member Committer
>> Agreement is in place. Also, the contributor is committer on CDT (but
>>not
>> yet on TCF).
>>
>> According to Legal Process Poster:
>> https://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf
>> page 1 / figure2 we should be able to commit this without extra due
>>diligence
>> effort on the IP team, if the PMC agrees this is OK (see also page 3).
>>
>> I can confirm that the contribution is needed for the project, and we
>>have
>> observed due diligence guidelines as every committer would do.
>>
>> Do you agree we can commit this without putting extra burden on the IP
>>team ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>> --
>> Martin Oberhuber , SMTS / Product Owner Development Tools, Wind River
>> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
>> _______________________________________________
>> tools-pmc mailing list
>> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tools-pmc mailing list
>> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>from
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>_______________________________________________
>tools-pmc mailing list
>tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
