Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [tools-pmc] [tm-dev] TM Project Lead

Strictly speaking, the EDP makes no requirement for a project lead to be a committer. For all practical purposes, though, not being a committer severely restricts what the person can do. There is at least one precedent for a project having a non-committer PL; but that was a short-lived point-in-time problem.

Wayne

On 03/25/2014 03:51 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
I guess the other question is:

Does the Project Lead have to be a committer himself ?

Note that not being a committer, I see no way how Greg could obtain access to our downloads area, website or promotion of bits to the release train ...

I don't know if there is any precedent of any projects led by a person not being committer ... Tools PMC, Wayne, any input ?

If existing commiters agree, we could probably combine the committer election with a PL election for Greg.

Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6


-----Original Message-----
From: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Watson
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:13 AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Cc: TM project developer discussions
Subject: Re: [tm-dev] [tools-pmc] TM Project Lead

It sounds like everyone is agreement. The TM committers just need to conduct a vote. Anna or David would you do this?

Regards,
Greg

On Mar 24, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

From the PMC perspective, I'm happy with this. I actually think a vote has already taken place, but it should be documented. TM is close to inactive, but I think a lot of us have a vested interested in the terminal at least. Greg mentioned the PTP community has interest in RSE. So let's do what we need to do to keep the project going.

Doug.

________________________________________
From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on 
behalf of Oberhuber, Martin [Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 2:29 PM
To: TM project developer discussions; Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [tm-dev] TM Project Lead

Hi Greg,

I guess you'll need to call for a formal vote on the tm-dev mailing list.

Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River 
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

-----Original Message-----
From: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Greg Watson
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:54 AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list; tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tm-dev] TM Project Lead

Hi,

I understand that David Dykstal no longer wishes to be PL of the TM project. I was asked by David Dykstal, Dave McKnight and Anna Dushistova (the active TM committers) to take over the PL job, which I'm willing to do. I'm presuming that the Tools PMC will also need to approve this. Is there anything else that needs to be done?

Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev


--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects
EclipseCon
          2014

Back to the top