Re: [tools-pmc] [CQ 8009] swtchart Version: 0.9

[Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My only comment is that we can’t assume that semantic version numbers are used by external projects, so the version shouldn’t be used to decide if it’s a minor update or not.

Regards,

Greg

On Feb 27, 2014, at 5:15 PM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As we agreed at last meeting, here's my "discussion" ... I think this should be approved. In fact, since 0.7 is already in Orbit, this 0.9 version might qualify for "minor" increment, thus qualify for parallel IP? The only question I'd ask submitter to make clear is if this required for Luna, or post-Luna.

Any objections? Other view?

Thanks,




From:        emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:        tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        02/27/2014 02:00 PM
Subject:        [tools-pmc] [CQ 8009] swtchart Version: 0.9
Sent by:        tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8009


Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Severity|new                         |awaiting_pmc




--- Comment #5 from Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2014-02-27 14:00:02 ---
This CQ is currently awaiting PMC Approval. PMC members, please use the
PMC_Approved flag on this CQ to indicate your approval (flag set to "+") or
disapproval (flag set to "-").


--
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc


_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc