[tools-pmc] [CQ 3241] Apache pdf transcoder library Version: 1.7 (PB CQ2

[emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]

http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3241


David Green <dgreen99@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|awaiting_committer          |awaiting_pmc




--- Comment #6 from David Green <dgreen99@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-10 16:38:59 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Okay, I went over to https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=258349
> ...awesome context...thank you!  I have 4 CQs to talk about, but I'll do it all
> on this one for ease of reference:

Thanks for your prompt response and friendly attitude.  This is my first time
navigating the CQ world and it's a little complex.

To put all of this in perspective, none of this is required for a Galileo
release.  It would be nice however I realize that we've missed the deadline. 
I'm trying to get the ball rolling here.  Mylyn may still be able to release a
feature that is not included in the Galileo release train but available via the
Mylyn update sites.

> 1.  CQ3241 - Is a duplicate of CQ3239.  Normally I would suggest we just close
> this one out.  However, I do not see an Orbit CQ for this package and if it's
> being created in Orbit, we should have one for it.  (CQ2490 is Modeling's, not
> Orbit's).  If you are an Orbit committer David, you can ask me (on this CQ) to
> change this CQ to be Orbit's.  If you are not an Orbit committer, then you can
> ask an Orbit committer if he wants to take this one over.  As soon as I see his
> response on this CQ, I can make the change accordingly.  

I'm not an Orbit committer.  I've posted to orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx to ask for a
volunteer.


> 2.  CQ3240 - I have to admit, I can't tell from the bugzilla entry whether this
> is critical for Galileo or not.  Can you please comment on that CQ whether it's
> "critical" or "nice to have" for Galileo.  

Done.

> 
> 3 & 4.  CQ3228 & CQ3229 - All that's required there is a project
> (like....say....Mylyn :-) hint hint) to say "hey we need this stuff" by
> creating their own project CQs piggybacking off the two pending in Orbit.  It's

done :)

> the reverse of what we'd normally see (i.e. when it's a new package, we would
> usually see the project CQs first), but that's no problem.  We can work with
> this.  When you create those CQs, the same request applies re Galileo ....
> please tell us if you need it. 
> 
> I think that's about it.  If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!

Thanks you've been very helpful.


-- 
Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.