[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tools-pmc] RE: [ve-dev] Contribution on VE with XML editor
|
Bjorn,
That sounds reasonable, but it sounds like it might only defer the issue
which would come back when VE releases and graduates again. It's not
entirely clear the extent to which we could intepret the rules in a
flexible way without incuring someone's wrath. The board might feel things
we do violate the spirit or intent of what the rules they've approved...
Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
Bjorn
Freeman-Benson
<bjorn.freeman-be To
nson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
10/22/2007 11:09 Tools PMC mailing list
AM <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx,
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: [tools-pmc] RE: [ve-dev]
Contribution on VE with XML editor
Ed, Doug,
How about if we are "flexible" on the rules and allow VE to be incubating
while having a version number > 1.0 ? As long as VE doesn't make a release
(M.N) without clearing the incubation state and as long as they follow the
rest of the incubation labeling rules (the egg, the "incubating" in file
and feature names, etc.) ??
- Bjorn
Ed Merks wrote:
It doesn't seem
reasonable for VE to go back to incubating since that would involve
reseting the version numbers back to below 1.0;
--
[end of message]
