[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [tools-pmc] RE: [ve-dev] Contribution on VE with XML editor
|
Ed wrote:
> You'll find the the incubating project rules will not allow
> you to use parallel IP unless you have a separate project for
> the incubator.
Fine by me. I can create a sub-project then. This is not that hard is it?
--
Cheers
Philippe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Merks [mailto:merks@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 12:25 PM
> To: pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx; Tools PMC mailing list
> Cc: 'Nick Boldt'; 'Tools PMC mailing list';
> tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [tools-pmc] RE: [ve-dev] Contribution on VE with
> XML editor
>
>
> Philippe,
>
> You'll find the the incubating project rules will not allow
> you to use parallel IP unless you have a separate project for
> the incubator.
>
>
> Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
> 905-413-3265 (t/l 969)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Philippe
>
> Ombredanne"
>
> <pombredanne@gmai
> To
> l.com> "'Nick Boldt'"
>
> Sent by: <nickboldt@xxxxxxxxx>,
> "'Tools PMC
> tools-pmc-bounces mailing list'"
>
> @eclipse.org
> <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> cc
>
>
> 10/21/2007 02:18
> Subject
> PM RE: [tools-pmc] RE:
> [ve-dev]
> Contribution on VE
> with XML editor
>
>
> Please respond to
>
> pombredanne@gmail
>
> .com; Please
>
> respond to
>
> Tools PMC mailing
>
> list
>
> <tools-pmc@eclips
>
> e.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
> >Please forgive the naivete' of this question, but why can't pieces of
> incubating code live in the same repo as stable code?
> >Could you not just label the incubating bits with
> "Incubation" in their
> feature.xml/manifest.mf files,
> >in adherence to the incubation rules, and package those features in a
> separate zip from the main
> >VE SDK/runtime zips, named too with "incubation" in the zip
> name, eg.,
> ve-unstable-incubation-I20071021.zip ?
> >Why do we even need a separate project or component? Surely the
> >addition
> of
> new API or tools to an
> >existing project or component can be done in that project or
> component,
> especially if the new bits are
> >versioned appropriately with a 0.x.0 number instead of the higher #
> associated with the previously-released stable stuff ?
>
> I like that . This is even simpler, and brilliant!
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>
>
