[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
I think it¹s pretty simple. You guys need to commit to verify that the RSE
builds work with Mars and that the right bits are being put into the
Simultaneous release repo.
That¹s pretty standard with Eclipse projects. We need one or more
committers to validate this for us or it does violate the Eclipse Planning
Council requirements for inclusion in the simrel release.
Basically, it means we need committers to fill that role. We can start an
election based on the contributions you¹ve made to RSE. Even if there are
only a few, I think we could convince the Tools PMC (who I¹m representing
right now) to accept the results of the vote given the community need.
You¹ll need to work with Greg to get that process started.
Doug.
On 2014-12-12, 5:48 AM, "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On 9 Dec 2014, at 18:55, Greg Watson wrote:
>
>> The people who like RSE will need to step up and agree to support it
>
>So I'll do this again:
>
>Where can we get info on what is missing/needed ?
>
>We and VMWare would like to keep RSE in Mars since it provides essential
>functionality that
>does not seem to be anywhere covered by the remote work (UI browser,
>windows, osx support etc.)
>
>Thus for Mars we should sustain RSE IMO. Similar to what is happening
>with Eclipse DTP for multiple releases now.
>
>Can we do a hangout or skype call with those involved in early january
>and we will
>help where we can ?
>
>/max
>http://about.me/maxandersen
>_______________________________________________
>tm-dev mailing list
>tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
