[tigerstripe-dev] Re: Annotations - Assume tigerstripe schema in 'get' A

[Eric Dillon <erdillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: Annotations - Assume tigerstripe schema in 'get' API on IModelComponent

The published scheduled for the 0.4 release stream lists a 0.4M0 build on yesterday. It didn’t happen as I was in meetings since Monday.
I would like to push it out today. So, It would make sense to make that change AFTER that?

I’m planning to commit the last couple of changes for the Label Decorators that I worked on in the plan last night.

Anything else?

Eric


On 7/24/08 2:35 AM, "John Worrell (jworrell)" <jworrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

I have been working on the API for annotations on the IModelComponent I/F (more specifically on IAnnotatioCapable I/F which IModelComponent extends) and I think we agreed at the F2F that we should always assume the schema will be "tigerstripe" (certainly for the 'set' API we assume this). So, do I have your agreement to remove the "schemeID" parameter from all 'get' API calls (no arg. variants will also assume "tigerstripe" to be the schemeID)? I will check this in tomorrow, if I have agreement. This will require changes to templates and existing generator code.

Absence of a response will be taken to be agreement :-D

Thanks,

JohnW

 
  
    
 
  John  Worrell
Technical  Leader

jworrell@xxxxxxxxx
Phone:  +44 208824 9410
Mobile: +44 7789  922290
 Cisco  Systems Limited
250 Longwater Avenue
Reading
RG2  6GB
United Kingdom
Cisco home  page <http://www.cisco.com/global/UK/>

    
    
   Think before you print.
 This  e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole  use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or  disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the  intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),  please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of  this message.