[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[tigerstripe-dev] RE: So.... another issue with Annotations.
|
So, I tried to fix ProviderContext, but it doesn't have
visibility of the class.
I did manage to fix this by adding a provider defintion
for IField. BUt this seems fairly ugly.
Not sure what the right fix is for this. May need to
resolve the provider in the context of the provider...
Steve
I have been defining
quite a few annotations. However, some are not working
:)
The situation is
this..
Define an annotation
thus:
<extension
point="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.annotation.core.annotationType">
<definition
description="Persistence
Hints"
eclass="TransientHint"
epackage-uri="http://com.cisco.tigerstripe.annotation.chameleon.persistence"
id="com.cisco.tigerstripe.annotation.chameleon.persistence.inheritance"
name="Transient">
<target
type="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.workbench.model.deprecated_.IField"
unique="true">
</target>
<target
type="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.workbench.model.deprecated_.IManagedEntityArtifact"
unique="true">
</target>
</definition>
</extension>
The annotations
all pop up in the 'create' box correctly (against the right objects), but
nothing happens when I try to create one...
Looking at org.eclipse.tigerstripe.annotation.internal.core.ProviderManager, it
seems to be doing string comparisons on the target type against the Provider
type:
<extension
point="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.annotation.core.annotationProvider">
<provider
id="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.annotation.tsmodel.provider"
class="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.annotation.tsmodel.TSModelAnnotationProvider"
targetDescription="Model
Component"
type="org.eclipse.tigerstripe.workbench.model.deprecated_.IModelComponent">
<delegate
type="org.eclipse.jdt.core.IJavaElement"/>
</provider>
</extension>
I may be long at this wrongly, but that would be my best guess at
whats going wrong - that the classes should be loaded and a check to see if its
a subclass made. Any thoughts?
Steve
