| Hi Mickael,
we’ll look into it for sure. The emails on this list are about the release review, not the actual state of the project. We still have a few weeks to fix bugs and make sure we have a good release.
Cheers Miro
Hey Miro,
Not sure it's the right place to mention that, but I think https://github.com/eclipse/lsp4j/issues/282 should be considered as a blocker for this release as it prevents clients from adopting one of the biggest changes of the LSP. Note that it may also be an issue on my side failing to use the API correctly, but I'd really enjoy this ticket being at least investigated by some LSP4J contributors before releasing 0.6.0. (Not that I'm asking that by the way as I watch this ML, I'm not a PMC member and my comment doesn't have any authority over the release, it's just a friendly request ;)
Cheers,
_______________________________________________ technology-pmc mailing list technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
-- Dr. Miro Spönemann
Software engineer and consultant
Am Germaniahafen 1, 24143 Kiel
Tel.: +49 151 42679459
Sitz: Kiel, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 17385 Geschäftsführer: Sven Efftinge, Moritz Eysholdt, Dr. Jan Köhnlein
|
