Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Pending Microprofile Committer Elections

Comments like this bother me, as it suggests that the abstention is unrelated to the actual fitness of the individual and more as a political play. The context of the other comments, however, I'm going to assume that this isn't the case.

I am abstaining as I think we need to initiate a project restructuring into sub-projects.

If I read between the lines, I believe that the actual problem is that at least some committers don't trust that new committers will restrict themselves to repositories in their area of expertise and they feel a need to have finer grained control over write access.

Other than that, it looks like the process is working. IMHO, the comments by the abstainers are sufficient to explain why the election was problematic, and I stand behind Eric's veto.

Wayne

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Wayne,

Do you have more background on the Mircroprofile Committer Elections? It seems that the community has some issues. There were many abstains from the votes. Reading through the comments I was wondering whether those should actually have been veto's.

Some of the comments sound really concerning. I'm particularly concerned about the communication issues that have been raised. However, I don't have enough data to make a clear decision.

@PMC please take some time to read through the comments.

-Gunnar

--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/






_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc



--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects
The Eclipse Foundation

Back to the top