Re: [technology-pmc] Request for Oxygen RC4 respin

[Carsten Reckord <reckord@xxxxxxxx>]

Just to be clear, is your question about the RC4 respin in general, or your request to piggy-back on it with TCF?

Someone correct me if I assumed wrongly, but I took it from Frederic's announcement that the respin had been approved.

Thanks,
Carsten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:technology-pmc-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Oberhuber
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:04 PM
> To: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Request for Oxygen RC4 respin
> 
> Hi technology-pmc,
> 
> 
> I was wondering what the next steps are on $subject?
> 
> I've seen 2 +1's here on the PMC, but no communication on eclipse.org-
> planning-council .
> 
> 
> As per the Simrel exception process, a technology-pmc rep (zx?) should
> bring the issue to the planning council ... has this happened behind the
> scenes, or has it been decided not to move forward?
> 
> 
> I'm not pushing this way or the other, just trying to make sure that this
> isn't lost in translation unnecessarily...
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin