Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Vote for Committer status for Jonah Graham was started by Erwin De Ley

I agree with your assessment Gunnar.

We discussed this in the AC.

I think that the best solution is for me to run regular new committer sessions to provide education in our processes.

The handbook was, I believe, an important step in the right direction. A concise checklist is a good next step to consider as well [1]

Wayne

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=496029


On 13/06/16 09:07 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:

On 13 Jun 2016, at 14:57, Eric Rizzo <eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When a mentor is assigned to a new project, educating the new lead(s) about this (and other things) should be a priority. And it needs to be more than just "here's some wiki pages, go read." It needs to be a conversation.
Maybe mentors need a checklist of important items that new project leads are expected to *demonstrate* understanding of (guided by the mentors).

I'm afraid this will lower the number of people volunteering as mentors even further.

-Gunnar


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon
          France 2016

Back to the top