Re: [technology-pmc] IP process for multiple "same source" contributions

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

There are different aspects to the due diligence: provenance, license compatibility, copyright ownership, ... So the process, at least generally, is concerned with the actual attachment.

This is really IP Team territory. You should ask them who to best optimize this process at emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx

Wayne

On 14/04/16 02:44 PM, Mark Stoodley wrote:

I imagine we could lump several zips together in a CQ if we're contributing them all at the same time.

But if those contributions happen weeks or months apart, as these ones are, but they have exactly the same pedigree, do we really need to file a new CQ or could we maybe augment an earlier one (with wondrous potential for IP race conditions).

It's kind of a question about the "triage" activity that the IP folks perform as part of the parallel IP process, and whether that has much to do with the actual zip file or more about the info about where it comes from.

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation