Re: [technology-pmc] Committer vote for Arthur van Dorp has been approve

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What do you all think about filing a new bug to have the requirement dropped?

+1

Wayne

On 26/02/16 08:17 AM, Eric Rizzo wrote:

Something that's bugged me for a while is how the portal requires a comment when PMC approves a committer election. Do we *ever* have anything besides token comments like "welcome" in there? I don't recall ever seeing a single meaningful comment in the hundreds of elections we've approved in my time on the PMC.
Do other project PMC's use meaningful comments?

I found this old bug from 2007 (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=203314) where the requirement was established, but the "guidance about what should be in the comment" isn't there.

What do you all think about filing a new bug to have the requirement dropped?

Eric

portal on behalf of Eric Rizzo

February 26, 2016 8:14 AM

technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote
for Arthur van Dorp's full Committer status on the technology.scout
project. The next step is for the project lead to return to the portal and
fill in the VCS package and employer information for Arthur van Dorp.

The PMC's comments were: .

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

---

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation