Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval for technology.efxclipse 1.0

Hi,

I'd welcome staying under Technology which matches our project goals
very well! Do I need to schedule another review for the graduation or
can we do that as part of the 1.0 release review?

Tom

On 06.08.14 06:17, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> That's an interesting thought, Eric. I'm interested to hear what Tom
> thinks of the suggestion. I'm also curious to see what the Eclipse PMC
> thinks.
> 
> There is, however, no reason to move. The Technology PMC is long overdue
> for an update to the charter to reflect the actual nature of the
> project. We're really no longer just about incubating and are a viable
> long term home for projects that contain interesting technology.
> 
> Unless you see real value in moving the project, it may not be worth the
> effort.
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 19:55 -0400, Eric Rizzo wrote:
>> +1 on the release docs. Looks great.
>> I would suggest updating the project home page
>> (https://www.eclipse.org/efxclipse/index.html) to reflect the Java8
>> and Luna requirements.
>>
>> As for a new top-level home, perhaps the Eclipse project itself. SWT
>> lives under Platform there, so maybe e(fx)clipse belongs as a
>> sibling...?
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>>
>>> Tom Schindl
>>> August 5, 2014 1:37 PM
>>> Hi PMC,
>>>
>>> I'd like to point you to our review documentation [1] for the 1.0
>>> release of e(fx)clipse.
>>>
>>> With 1.0 we'd also like to leave Incubation status and graduate to a
>>> proper Eclipse project who follows API guidelines, ... .
>>>
>>> Some highlights:
>>> * We fully support Eclipse Luna and e4 Luna Platform
>>> * We fixed a total number of 104 bugs/feature requests
>>> * We managed to attract devlopers who provided code contributions
>>> * We saw commercial adoption of our codebase
>>>
>>> The IP-Log has been submitted to the IP-Team today.
>>>
>>> Something I'm uncertain and you might be able to clarify is that I
>>> somehow remember that Technology only has Incubation projects and I
>>> need
>>> to find a new Top-Level home for e(fx)clipse. Is that still valid?
>>>
>>> The problem I see in case I have to find another Top-Level project
>>> is
>>> that we have a strong binding to Tooling AND Runtime so the Tools
>>> Top-Level project does not feel like the right component, nor does
>>> the
>>> RT-Project.
>>>
>>> If you like to get more informations about the upcoming features I'd
>>> like to point you to my blog [2] where I'll go through 1.0 feature
>>> one
>>> by one including screenshots, ... .
>>>
>>> Now that we shipped 1.0, we'll return to 6-8 week *release* cycles
>>> so
>>> expect more reviews in the months to come and naturally we'll join
>>> the
>>> Mars release train.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> [1]https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.efxclipse/releases/1.0.0/review
>>> [2]http://tomsondev.bestsolution.at/tag/release-efxclipse-1-0/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> technology-pmc mailing list
>>> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> technology-pmc mailing list
>> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
> 



Back to the top