Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aub

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry

From: Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:43:03 +0100
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

Am 03.01.2013 17:30, schrieb Eric Rizzo:

None of those Bugzilla links shows any code contribution from Marc (no
attachments). [...] Isn't any
code contributed by non-committers *required* to go that route?

As far as Git is concerned, patches attached to bugs are not requiredanymore. You can "merge" commits directly from other Git repositoriesretaining the original authorship information.


http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Handling_Git_Contributions

HTH,
Gunnar


--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/

References:
- [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry
  - From: portal on behalf of emo
- Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry
  - From: Eric Rizzo

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Marc Aubry
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] [CQ 6993] oauth-provider Version: 20100527
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs