[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

We can turn those things around pretty quickly, so let's just hold.

I assume that you've already familiarized yourself with the b3 files and so are ready to go, right?

Wayne

On 02/28/2012 01:37 PM, Benjamin Cabé wrote:
That's awesome!
Should I start asking Eclipse Webmaster / David for write access on the Juno aggregator project already, in order to save a few days and get ready ASAP should the planning council finally gives a real GO?

Thanks,
Benjamin -


________________________________________________________________________


De : Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:07:43 -0800
À : "technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Much/most of the planning council has responded to my petition for Koneki to join Juno with a +1. No concerns so far. But, we need to give this another couple of days to wrap up.

Wayne

On 02/22/2012 01:12 PM, Benjamin Cabé wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Wayne.

The three new (6240, 6241, 6242) would need to be approved for Juno indeed.
Regarding the remaining four:
  • 5278 is NOT needed for Juno
  • 5275 and 5575 ARE needed.
  • 5276 could virtually be withdrawn, since 6240 is requesting the inclusion of a newer version of the Metalua library. 5276 already passed preliminary review, though, and I have detailed in 6240 with as much detailed possible the delta between the version in 5276, and the one in 6240 that we would need for Juno.
Thanks,
Benjamin

________________________________________________________________________


De : Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : Technology PMC <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:04:42 -0800
À : "technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [technology-pmc] Request from Koneki LDT to join Juno release train

Strictly speaking, the CQs need to be identified as being required for Juno by Feb 8. But since they're already in the system, we may have some wiggle room.

I see the three new CQs; can I assume that the remaining four currently unapproved CQs must also be approved for Juno?

Wayne

  
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
EclipseCon 2012AGILEALM 2012
_______________________________________________ technology-pmc mailing list technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
EclipseCon
          2012AGILEALM
          2012

PNG image

GIF image

PNG image

GIF image